Username    Password    Login Remember me Cancel Remember me    Forgot your password? Change your password  

Technical Talk -> Exhausts.Triumph original short exha... - Custom bent pipes?
Previous page - [1],[2],[All]
Categories : 
Topic : shorty TOR's compared to long TOR's?
 Author 
Post  
 CornerBanger 
Jupiter
Reg. Date : 07/07/2010
Posts : 1,113
Location : Charleston, SC, United States
Posted : 12 Nov 2010 - 16:13   Post title : Re: shorty TOR's compared to long TOR's? (Re: DizzE)
 

DizzE wrote:

Well, you know I wouldn't lie...there is no profit, Feringe.

But, for you, since they are just sitting there, I re-checked.

One Long pipe = 11 lbs


You Star Trek New Generation "Humon" freak... lol

 
There are those who own and there are those who ride!

2010 Thunderbird
2007 Kawi KX250F
2010 Kawi KX85 (My boy's ride)
 Author 
Post  
 DizzE 
Thor
Reg. Date : 12/07/2010
Posts : 3,141
Location : Sunnyvale, CA, United States
Posted : 13 Nov 2010 - 00:25   Post title : Re: shorty TOR's compared to long TOR's? (Re: CornerBanger)
 
ugly bags of mostly water

 Author 
Post  
 daz 
Zeus
Reg. Date : 12/05/2009
Posts : 7,686
Location :  United States
Posted : 13 Nov 2010 - 01:31   Post title : Re: shorty TOR's compared to long TOR's? (Re: DizzE)
 
Well i'll be damned....you're right. I showed 11.6 Lbs. I would have guess there could be close to 30 Lbs savings over all, but obviously i was WAAAAAAY off since the longs together are only about 23 Lbs. That floors me that the 2 together are only 23 Lbs ! I must be getting even weaker than i thought in my old age because they feel like they weight about 50 Lbs together when i lift the box with the 2 of them. I've always been pretty good when it comes to guessing quantities like speed, time, etc, but apparently weight is the exception big time !

 
2010 Blue/White Thunderbird, "Brutus". 1700 kit, short tors, gutted cat, UNI filter, filter seal off, custom tune. Brutus in his native habitat: Link
 Author 
Post  
 DizzE 
Thor
Reg. Date : 12/07/2010
Posts : 3,141
Location : Sunnyvale, CA, United States
Posted : 13 Nov 2010 - 21:29   Post title : Re: shorty TOR's compared to long TOR's? (Re: daz)
 
Smooth as an electric motor above 80....I like that. Straighten that right out. Dynamo hum.

I think some Pipes are for looks and these are for power. I like the look, the balance, sound and the new motor breath.
But, it smells a bit rich w/TOR. Anyone else get that? Maybe I'm smelling the breakin?

 Author 
Post  
 daz 
Zeus
Reg. Date : 12/05/2009
Posts : 7,686
Location :  United States
Posted : 13 Nov 2010 - 22:05   Post title : Re: shorty TOR's compared to long TOR's? (Re: DizzE)
 
Nope, but mine were used when i installed them so i suppose you could be smelling the break in. Try applying rotation on it's sugar plum.

 
2010 Blue/White Thunderbird, "Brutus". 1700 kit, short tors, gutted cat, UNI filter, filter seal off, custom tune. Brutus in his native habitat: Link
Previous page - [1],[2],[All]